Tuesday, 21 August 2012
Friday, 3 August 2012
"It is often said that too many cook spoil the Broth" but I like to point out that it is not the increased number of men who are responsible for the lack of productivity but the lack of management plays the key role .
A Chinese video depicts the scenario very well and shows how the efficiency of any organisation is enhanced by creating a synergy . 1+1 is not 2 but 11 , if we can utilize all the resources available properly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_V4PnqIkUc
In this video, we have seen 3 cases
CASE-1
A single monk is carrying water up the hill from pond. In this case , there is no internal disputes and the effort was solely made for own consumption.
This case is not desired because one remains aloof from the society and thus don't realize the potential of working together.
CASE-2
As another monk joins the temple , disputes which started arising .
These disputes were
1) Regarding division of work
2) Regarding distribution of benefits of labor.
Very important thing to note is that to solve the problem ,they finally formulated the right method i.e they come up with standardized system to measure the efforts.
It was also important to see that both of them were involved in setting the standards.one was holding the scale and other was marking the length.This led to prevention of any biased bureaucracy.
CASE-3
In this case, the complication increases when the 3rd monk enters the temple.The disputes that arises was similar to that of earlier cases .
There was also an issue regarding division of labor and final distribution of resources. This creates a lower efficiency in the system and synergy was missing.
There was also a loss of mutual relationship among the monarch members.
The scenario changed when the fire break out in the temple and all the three monks started working together and saved the temple.
It was important to note that the mutual participation and setting the same goal (i.e saving the temple) helped to create a synergy.
As the monks arbitrated the issue among themselves ,they started finding the other ways to do the work and thus " innovation" was brought in to the work.
Innovation was the result of synergy which generated by the mutual participation among the monks.
The final result was an improved living standard and better work planning.
The table shows the analysis of the video
METHOD COMPARISON TABLE:
Method I
|
Method II
|
Method III
| |
Members
|
One Monk
|
Two Monks
|
Three Monks
|
Work tools and work method
|
Two baskets
Long stick hanging two buckets two ends of the long stick..
|
One basket
Long stick hanging one bucket in the middle
|
Three baskets
Rope, Kuppe, and pulling water bucket on pulli
|
Input - Effort by monks ( Units in Jouls) ( Esti..)
|
100 Jouls
by One person
|
50 Jouls by two persons together
|
Total effort together by the three monks in this method is almost ' INSIGNIFICANT'.
|
Output - Water
|
2 baskets
|
One basket
|
The output ( number of baskets of water ) that the method can fetch is almost ' SO MUCH WATER'
|
Productivity Measure: ( Input / Output)
|
100 J / 2 =
50 J per basket of water
|
50 J / 2 =
25 J per basket of water
|
Insignificant effort per basket of water
|
Nature of Member Roles
|
Independent
|
Somewhat Interdependent
|
Very much Interdependent
|
Monks Life
philosophy@ monastry
|
Life is misery and
Death is the solution
@ This is evident as shown in the film the monk is physically exhausted and gets in to sleep once he gets water from the pond. |
Life some how can be managed to make it worth living ..
@ This is evident as shown in the film the monks engage in more productive prayers. Monks are shown not sleeping as much as they used to do earlier. |
Life is Fun and even monks can have
blissful life..
@ This is evident as shown in the film that the monks are happy and blissful to work together. |
Sunday, 29 July 2012
Valley crossing –a team
based organisation
Today we will
discuss about the importance of team work and the valley crossing activity as a team activity but before we proceed further it is better to
discuss what one of our eminent personality says about team work.
Friends team means
a strongly bonded organisation. It is an absolute form of unity and it has its
own spirit formed from the individual spirit . A life threatening situation
like valley crossing requires something bigger than just an organisation .It
requires a team spirit.
Let us look into
some peculiarities of Team
1) Very high level of commitment among
individuals towards the goal.
2) A high level of individual trust .
3) A very high level of communication
required.
Tuesday, 10 July 2012
YES ONE MAN CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE(ABOUT KHAN ACADEMY)
“ Yes ,one man can make a difference “ that’s what I felt
when I first landed on the khan academy site. Initiated by Salman Khan ( MIT
graduate in electrical ,mathematics ,computer and also a Harvard graduate)the
academy is like a revolution and changing
the traditional model education
system.
“khan Academy” is today one of its own kind of tutorial with
over 3200 videos. It is extensively used world wide with free accessibility and
covered a diverse Area ,with topics ranging from mathematics to History .
Khan Academy proves that “ Something are above money and profits “.Khan not only
gave up his lucrative Job as Hedge fund manager but also financed the Project
from his own pocket in its initial years. He also stopped the advertising money
once he started receiving money in the form of Donation from leading business
heads. This shows how khan put ethics always before money. Ethics was not just limited to Books for him
but beyond tha the implemented in his
real life too.
I was inquisitive about
what made salman khan leave his Job ?? why
his lectures succeed inspite of the presence of 1000 other videos in you tube
?? what he did differently or what were his strengths that he was able to
generate such an influence??
I started my search to answer this questions and was fruitless until I came across this
video http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=1C7FH7El35w&feature=relmf
.In this video khan shared his feelings on what was his motivation for this project . what
was going through his mind when he was leaving his job.(In b/w 1:14:00 to 1:16:0)
I also read the
viewers comments on few of his random sample videos to find what were his
strengths of videos compared to other
videos.
Few points which I came up were:-
1)
Salman khan knowledge in computers(graduation
from MIT) helped him to design his education system better .He was always able
to use his knowledge to modify his interaction
and manage his deliveries better (He confesses it at the start of video).
I learned that knowledge of the system is as important as the matter
itself because how it is communicated is ensured by the system.
2)
His delivery style was different .He was not
present in front of video instead he was delivering his lecture in background.
There is an interesting point why Salman did this .He explained while he was
tutoring his Cousin Nadia .He
accidentally used this method .In the next lecture when he tried to present in
a conventional way to his cousin ,his cousin asked Salman to present it the earlier way because it was more friendly.
Hence forth, Salman continue presenting with dark background and being not visible
himself.
3)
His way of teaching was more casual and more
friendlier voice that encouraged the
young school boys to like him. It was
not a lecturer voice that was teaching them but a friend who was guiding them.
4)
Salman covered a topic in a very systematic way .He discussed its
merit in the video.
Thus Khan Academy not only
teaches one about subjects but also about How a mix of Motivation and
concentrating on smaller details can make a big difference and can play a huge
role on your success.
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
Lecture 1
We all came for another morning class and started searching
for the most convenient seat and finally
positioned ourself in those comfortable chairs and were waiting
for another long lecture to be delivered
and our pens waiting for one more gruelling exercise .
An elderly person but
more energetic than any other in our class entered and introduce himself “I am
like any other sarkari aadmi and and would appreciate if somebody can share a
little more information about me”. It was a blunt and frank introduction and
what was completely different from what one can think.
Life is all about different approaches and breaking traditional learning ,with this note our
class begun. We are told about importance of practical learning and that an
idea is valuable only when we can sell it.
“Socho becho
Becho sikho
Sikho socho”
Was the mantra which set the tone of our 1st
lecture in Principles of Management .
Dr. Mandi(as he wanted to be named)led us to his world
,where ideas were not just limited to textbooks but makes money .what followed was a set of examples
ranging from toys displaying
scientific priciples to the big corporate giants who made the future by
selling their ideas. “Aaaj ki roti aaj
hi Kamana “ is the primary aim of a manager and the better hi
does it better it is for the country and him.
Lecture -2(Practical situation faced in the work
environment ,SMART goals, Theory X and Theory Y)
The second lecture was more about setting the achievable goals and practicle situation
faced by a manager at his work environment . He has to set SMART goals(specific , Measurable
,achievable ,Reasonable and time Bound goals ). He should be willing to take
risk and think the tough situation as an opportunity to show his Skills.
“There is nothing impossible under the sun “ he emphasized with a practical example of making a tower of
cubes just “if we change our attitude about a particular situation “.
He further stressed
on the importance of attitude with his Theory X and Theory Y .
Let us assume, X and Y are two types of managers where X is
negative, thinks his employees are lazy and inefficient whereas manager Y is
very positive and believes his workers are not lazy and very effective.
Hence, there are four situations in this scenario:
Employee is lazy and
X think they are lazy
In this situation employees are lazy and the manager assumes
them to be lazy. So this kind of scenario is harmful for the organisation and
is neither going to help the organization nor the employees. The manager
himself so negative will always create an unhealthy work environment in the
organization. He will never encourage his lazy employees to change the scenario
and think positive.
Employee is not lazy
but X think they are lazy
In this situation
employees are not lazy but the manager assumes them to be lazy. So this
situation is very harmful and demotivates the employees who want to excel and
do well. This stops the employees to do justice to their talent and make them
inefficient. The management underestimates the employees and ultimately hamper
the growth of the employees and company.
Employee is lazy but Y believes they are not
lazy
In this situation
employees are lazy and the manager assumes them to be efficient and hard
working. A lazy employee can be a problem for any organization but he needs to
be dealt properly so that output may be maximized. So managers motivate these
employees with compliments followed by constructive criticism, this sometimes
creates positive impact on the employee. They feel more motivated to do well.
Also, when people are given responsibility, they tend to work harder. If this
kind of positives steps are taken, there can be significant change.
Employee is not lazy
and Y think they are not lazy
In this situation employees are not lazy and the manager
also assumes them to be efficient and hard working. This is the most
appropriate situation in any organization. Hard working dedicated employees are
constantly motivated by the managers and the growth of the company along with
employees sails off in a very efficient way. Target set by the managers are
easily achieved with high level of accuracy. The organization starts growing
rapidly in all respects in this kind of ideal situation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)