"It is often said that too many cook spoil the Broth" but I like to point out that it is not the increased number of men who are responsible for the lack of productivity but the lack of management plays the key role .
A Chinese video depicts the scenario very well and shows how the efficiency of any organisation is enhanced by creating a synergy . 1+1 is not 2 but 11 , if we can utilize all the resources available properly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_V4PnqIkUc
In this video, we have seen 3 cases
CASE-1
A single monk is carrying water up the hill from pond. In this case , there is no internal disputes and the effort was solely made for own consumption.
This case is not desired because one remains aloof from the society and thus don't realize the potential of working together.
CASE-2
As another monk joins the temple , disputes which started arising .
These disputes were
1) Regarding division of work
2) Regarding distribution of benefits of labor.
Very important thing to note is that to solve the problem ,they finally formulated the right method i.e they come up with standardized system to measure the efforts.
It was also important to see that both of them were involved in setting the standards.one was holding the scale and other was marking the length.This led to prevention of any biased bureaucracy.
CASE-3
In this case, the complication increases when the 3rd monk enters the temple.The disputes that arises was similar to that of earlier cases .
There was also an issue regarding division of labor and final distribution of resources. This creates a lower efficiency in the system and synergy was missing.
There was also a loss of mutual relationship among the monarch members.
The scenario changed when the fire break out in the temple and all the three monks started working together and saved the temple.
It was important to note that the mutual participation and setting the same goal (i.e saving the temple) helped to create a synergy.
As the monks arbitrated the issue among themselves ,they started finding the other ways to do the work and thus " innovation" was brought in to the work.
Innovation was the result of synergy which generated by the mutual participation among the monks.
The final result was an improved living standard and better work planning.
The table shows the analysis of the video
METHOD COMPARISON TABLE:
Method I
|
Method II
|
Method III
| |
Members
|
One Monk
|
Two Monks
|
Three Monks
|
Work tools and work method
|
Two baskets
Long stick hanging two buckets two ends of the long stick..
|
One basket
Long stick hanging one bucket in the middle
|
Three baskets
Rope, Kuppe, and pulling water bucket on pulli
|
Input - Effort by monks ( Units in Jouls) ( Esti..)
|
100 Jouls
by One person
|
50 Jouls by two persons together
|
Total effort together by the three monks in this method is almost ' INSIGNIFICANT'.
|
Output - Water
|
2 baskets
|
One basket
|
The output ( number of baskets of water ) that the method can fetch is almost ' SO MUCH WATER'
|
Productivity Measure: ( Input / Output)
|
100 J / 2 =
50 J per basket of water
|
50 J / 2 =
25 J per basket of water
|
Insignificant effort per basket of water
|
Nature of Member Roles
|
Independent
|
Somewhat Interdependent
|
Very much Interdependent
|
Monks Life
philosophy@ monastry
|
Life is misery and
Death is the solution
@ This is evident as shown in the film the monk is physically exhausted and gets in to sleep once he gets water from the pond. |
Life some how can be managed to make it worth living ..
@ This is evident as shown in the film the monks engage in more productive prayers. Monks are shown not sleeping as much as they used to do earlier. |
Life is Fun and even monks can have
blissful life..
@ This is evident as shown in the film that the monks are happy and blissful to work together. |
Good that you adopted the table with method comparison. I would have loved your blog if you write more and discussed the methods with examples and your work experiences.
ReplyDeleteWish you give a try for learning. dr mandi